25.2.09

Is English Only a Battle to Fight?

I am a proud 5th generation American. In the 1860’s my ancestors came to New England from French Canada and settled in Massachusetts. My grandmother grew up speaking French. My mother went to a French grammar school and till the day she died my great-grandmother spoke with a slight French accent. I relate all of this not to give a personal history but because it pertains to a debate that is always raging in conservative circles. Should English be made our official language? Too often Republicans try to fight a battle they do not need to, while ignoring one that could be won. We have seen the failings of excessive multiculturalism, but instead of alienating a growing and voting demographic, we should be working to rebuild the American melting pot of the early 20th century.

First of all, English is not going anywhere in America, or throughout the world. Because it is so widely spoken, it has often been referred to as the world language of the modern era. English is the language most often studied as a foreign language in Europe (by 89% of schoolchildren), followed by French (32%). It is, by international treaty, the official language for aerial and maritime communications. English is an official language of the United Nations and many other international organizations, including the International Olympic Committee. According to 2006 U.S. census 84% of Americans speak it. Clearly, we live in a safely English-speaking world. The complaint is that too often immigrants to the US do not speak it, or do not speak it well enough. However, the facts do not bear this out.

Language diversity has always been a significant part of American culture. As early as 1664, when the island of Manhattan was ceded from the Dutch to the British, 18 different tongues were spoken there. In the 1790 census, German Americans accounted for 8.6 percent of the population – roughly the same proportion of modern Hispanic Americans at 9.0 percent. In the 1890 census, there were almost 5 times as many non-English speakers than in the 1990 census. Significant groups of French speakers remained in Louisiana and northern New England for decades. However, they gradually turned to English – not because laws were passed, but because of social pressure from industrialization, migration and mass media. If MTV, Disney and CNN are in English the people will follow.

Language acquisition is generational. Just as my mother spoke French as a child and I can barely conjugate a French verb, nearly all of Hispanic adults born in the United States of immigrant parents report they are fluent in English. By contrast, only a small minority of their parents describe themselves as fluent. Immigrants are behaving just like previous generations of immigrants did who spoke Dutch, Swedish, German, Italian, Polish, Russian, French, Greek, Yiddish, Hindi, Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese, Portuguese, Persian, and Ukrainian. Legislating English as the official language of the U.S., is redundant. There is no reason to pass laws requiring people to do what they are already doing. Instead of picking fights with recent immigrants working daily double-shifts at the local chain restaurant to make a living, we should be standing for the promotion of uniquely American ideas and ideals in our schools and society at large. While the "hate America" crowd is often over-hyped, it does exist, and we won't defeat them by pushing useless laws. We need to raise a generation of Americans who value their heritage.

We offer the world something special, as evidenced by the number of people who want to come here. And we do a better job than most in assimilating new people into our unique culture, but we could be doing better. We should be promoting a healthy nationalism. What is it that makes us Americans? It is our lack of an official caste system, our reverence for the Bill of Rights, our innate Self-sufficiency, our freedom of but not from religion. If we as a nation focused more on indoctrinating our youth with a greater sense of who they are as Americans we would be doing them a great service. Bringing real civics back to our schools will do more to keep our heritage alive, than repeatedly pushing the English only mantra.

Post sponsored by Quality-Resumes. 

18.2.09

Conservative Rules to Live By

There are no shortage of political thinkers out there with rules for new conservatives to live by. Most of them seem reasonable enough, so the question is, why don't Republicans and even Blue Dog Democrats run on these principles? Wouldn't a majority of Americans support them? Below is a sampling of some of the more prominent. My hope is that conservatives will rally around some formation of these in order to bring some common sense back to the playing field in 2010.

Glenn Beck's 9 Principles:

1. America is good.

2. I believe in God and He is the Center of my Life.

3. I must always try to be a more honest person than I was yesterday.

4. The family is sacred. My spouse and I are the ultimate authority, not the government.

5. If you break the law you pay the penalty. Justice is blind and no one is above it.

6. I have a right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness, but there is no guarantee of equal results.

7. I work hard for what I have and I will share it with who I want to. Government cannot force me to be charitable.

8. It is not un-American for me to disagree with authority or to share my personal opinion.

9. The government works for me. I do not answer to them, they answer to me.


Rod Dreher's Crunchy Con manifesto:


1. We are conservatives who stand outside the conservative mainstream; therefore, we can see things that matter more clearly.

2. Modern conservatism has become too focused on money, power, and the accumulation of stuff, and insufficiently concerned with the content of our individual and social character.

3. Big business deserves as much skepticism as big government.

4. Culture is more important than politics and economics.

5. A conservatism that does not practice restraint, humility, and good stewardship—especially of the natural world—is not fundamentally conservative.

6. Small, Local, Old, and Particular are almost always better than Big, Global, New, and Abstract.
7. Beauty is more important than efficiency.

8. The relentlessness of media-driven pop culture deadens our senses to authentic truth, beauty, and wisdom.

9. We share Russell Kirk’s conviction that “the institution most essential to conserve is the family.”


Newt Gingrich's American Solutions Platform:

1. English should be the official language of government.

2. We want our elected leaders in Washington to focus on increasing the energy supplies of the United States and lowering the costs of gasoline and electricity.

3. The option of a single rate system should give taxpayers the convenience of filing their taxes with just a single sheet of paper.

4. Every worker should continue to have the right to a federally supervised secret ballot election when deciding whether to organize a union.

5. Keeping the reference to “One Nation Under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance is very important.

6. Congress should make it a crime to advocate acts of terrorism, violent conduct, or the killing of innocent people in the United States.

7. We should dramatically increase our investment in math and science education.

8. We believe that if research indicates we could build clean coal plants in the United States with no carbon emissions, it would be important to build such plants as rapidly as possible.

9. Illegal immigrants who commit felonies should be deported.

10. We support giving a large financial prize to the first company or individual who invents a new, safer way to dispose of nuclear waste products.

Post sponsored by Quality-Resumes.

16.2.09

Questions for the Week

  • There are lots of lists out there detailing winner and losers on the stimulus fight. Aside from the politicians who of course will always be on such a list most of the winners include social programs like unemployment & health services and the losers include big & small businesses and military spending. How long will it be before the losers start angling for Stimulus: The Sequel?
  • Japan suffered a "lost decade" in the 1990's even though they past 8 stimulus packages to try and fix their economy. With the U.S. economy so dependent on consumer spending and not on tangible manufacturing, are we headed in the same direction? If there is a Stimulus: The Sequel, will it focus exclusively on promoting production?
  • The last election weeded out many moderate Republicans. With the Republican caucus now predominantly made up of only "true believers" was the stimulus fight a predictor of what is to come? Will we see more and more political battles where Pelosi pushes through legislation without a single Republican vote? Should moderate conservatives focus more attention on Blue Dog Democrats in order to influence the legislation that will pass?
  • Sen. Roland Burris admitted Saturday that former Gov. Rod Blagojevich's brother asked him for a campaign contribution before the governor appointed Mr. Burris to the Senate. Should Republicans go after this or leave it alone? Maybe Burris will run in 2010 if they stay quiet? Blago: the gift that keeps giving.
  • John Sununu has made some noise about running for Senator Judd Gregg's seat in 2010. Is this a possible return of a reasonably moderate Republican? We hope so. Sununu was a solid conservative, but no idealogue, who was lost in the tsunami that was Obama mania
Post sponsored by Quality-Resumes. 

    11.2.09

    The Stimulating Maine Senators

    Who is going to be the most powerful woman in America? Hillary Clinton? Michelle Obama? Sarah Palin? No. No. No. Susan Collins? Olympia Snowe? Maybe. The two senators from Maine are shaping up to be two of the most powerful members of the next Congress, male or female. That is what I said back in December, and unfortunately I was right. Sens. Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine, as well as Pennsylvania's Arlen Specter risked the anger of their fellow Republicans to help push the controversial economic spending plan over the finish line earlier this week.

    Facing the inevitable backlash over her support for the $827 billion stimulus package, Collins joined Sen. Ben Nelson, D-NE, and other centrist lawmakers to trim out more than $110 billion from the huge package and help push for its passage.

    "Well, I know that some of my Republican colleagues are unhappy with the position that I've taken," Collins told FOX News on Saturday. "I hope they will look at the fact that we were able to cut $110 billion of unnecessary spending from this bill. I think that's a good accomplishment. I also think that it's important that we do pass a stimulus bill to help turn the economy around."
    What exactly did the Nelson-Collins agreement include? Here is a partial list:

    * $7 billion in rural broadband infrastructure

    * $1.87 billion for Community Health Center infrastructure

    * $64.4 billion for our nation's K-12 educational system

    * $19 billion for a 10% non-refundable tax credit (capped at $15,000) for any home purchase

    * $6.4 billion for a down payment on the Energy Superhighway and a Smart Grid

    * $9.6 billion renewable energy investments

    * $250 million in rural renewable energy Investments

    * $42 billion in transportation infrastructure investments

    * $6.4 billion for environmental infrastructure including water and sewer infrastructure

    * $87 billion in temporary and targeted Medicaid relief to states

    * $70 billion for a one year fix for the Alternative Minimum Tax

    * $13.9 billion more for Pell Grants to help thousands of college students pay for increases in college costs.

    * $13 billion more for Special Education/IDEA to improve education for disabled children

    * $3.5 billion for law enforcement, including $1.2 billion for popular Byrne grants for drug task forces.

    "This deal represents a victory for the American people," said Senator Collins. "We came together to tackle the most immediate problem facing the nation. This package cuts $110 billion in unnecessary expenditures. These are not minor adjustments, but major changes. It contains robust spending on infrastructure to create jobs, $87 billion in assistance for states, and assistance to schools, especially for special education and Pell grants. This bill is not perfect, but it represents a bipartisan, effective and targeted approach to the crisis facing our country." Bipartisan? That is certainly debatable as only 3 Republicans signed on, and those 3 happen to be the most liberal Republicans in the Senate. Even Mr. bipartisan himself, John McCain was actively against this deal.

    While right now economists seem split as to whether or not the stimulus will actually work, only time will tell. And even then it may be unclear as the economy is sure to rebound eventually no matter what action the government takes. What remains unquestionable is the fact that the women from Maine have shown they will be players in the new congress, and that is not necessarily good news for Republicans.

    Post sponsored by Quality-Resumes. 

    8.2.09

    Told You So

    I warned months ago that my fear of an Obama election was the recasting of America as a European style state. A sampling of recent articles that make the case....

    We Are All Socialists Now
    In many ways our economy already resembles a European one. As boomers age and spending grows, we will become even more French.

    The interview was nearly over. on the Fox News Channel last Wednesday evening, Sean Hannity was coming to the end of a segment with
    Indiana Congressman Mike Pence, the chair of the House Republican Conference and a vociferous foe of President Obama's nearly $1 trillion stimulus bill. How, Pence had asked rhetorically, was $50 million for the National Endowment for the Arts going to put people back to work in Indiana? How would $20 million for "fish passage barriers" (a provision to pay for the removal of barriers in rivers and streams so that fish could migrate freely) help create jobs? Hannity could not have agreed more. "It is … the European Socialist Act of 2009," the host said, signing off. "We're counting on you to stop it. Thank you, congressman."

    There it was, just before the commercial: the S word, a favorite among conservatives since John McCain began using it during the presidential campaign. (Remember Joe the Plumber? Sadly, so do we.) But it seems strangely beside the point. The U.S. government has already—under a conservative Republican administration—effectively nationalized the banking and mortgage industries. That seems a stronger sign of socialism than $50 million for art. Whether we want to admit it or not—and many, especially Congressman Pence and Hannity, do not—the America of 2009 is moving toward a modern European state.

    We remain a center-right nation in many ways—particularly culturally, and our instinct, once the crisis passes, will be to try to revert to a more free-market style of capitalism—but it was, again, under a conservative GOP administration that we enacted the largest expansion of the welfare state in 30 years: prescription drugs for the elderly. People on the right and the left want government to invest in alternative energies in order to break our addiction to foreign oil. And it is unlikely that even the reddest of states will decline federal money for infrastructural improvements.

    If we fail to acknowledge the reality of the growing role of government in the economy, insisting instead on fighting 21st-century wars with 20th-century terms and tactics, then we are doomed to a fractious and unedifying debate. The sooner we understand where we truly stand, the sooner we can think more clearly about how to use government in today's world. -Meacham & Thomas, Newsweek

    *********************************************************************
    Here Comes the State
    Voters, then, have every reason to expect from Washington a stimulus bill that will help restore growth. But they aren't getting one. The stimulus plan is flawed. It marries a few measures that count as stimulus with tons of spending on a domestic agenda that the Democrats have waited years to push through Congress. Why? Because Obama and the Democrats who run Congress are more interested in an idea than they are in economic recovery.

    That idea has two components. One: The conservative era, with its more-free-than-not markets, is over.
    Two: Now is the time to complete the American welfare state by (a) introducing universal health care and (b) fostering economic equality through higher taxes on income, capital, and estates and increased union membership.
    The stimulus bill needs to be seen in this light. It is just the beginning. For Obama, the stimulus is a "down payment" on "investments" in health care, alternative energy, education, scientific and medical research, and infrastructure. When you buy a car, you don't stop with the down payment. There are many, many more "payments" to come. How large will these payments be? How long will we be paying them?

    Our newly political economy has diverse sectors. This week the administration will lay out its rescue for the banking sector. The plan likely will combine buying up bad mortgage-backed securities with guaranteeing financial institutions' balance sheets. This might or might not help the global financial system. What it definitely will do is further enmesh the government in that system. -Matthew Continetti, The Weekly Standard
    ************************************************************************

    The Stimulus Tragedy
    Obama bets that we can spend our way to prosperity.
    President Obama has started to play the "catastrophe" card to sell his economic stimulus plan, using yesterday's terrible January jobs report to predict doom unless Congress acts. No doubt he'll get his way, but the tragedy of this first great effort of the Obama Presidency is what a lost opportunity it is.

    Everyone agrees that some kind of fiscal stimulus might help the economy, and that running budget deficits is appropriate in a recession. The stage was thus set for the popular President to forge a bipartisan consensus that combined ideas from both parties. A major cut in the corporate tax favored by Republicans could have been added to Democratic public works spending for a quick political triumph that might have done at least some economic good.
    Instead, Mr. Obama chose to let House Democrats write the bill, and they did what comes naturally: They cleaned out their intellectual cupboards and wrote a bill that is 90% social policy, and 10% economic policy. (
    See here for a case study.) It is designed to support incomes with transfer payments, rather than grow incomes through job creation.

    This is the reason the bill has run into political trouble, despite a new President with 65% job approval. The 11 Democrats who opposed it in the House didn't do so because they want to hand Mr. Obama a defeat. The same is true of the Senate moderates of both parties working to trim their $900 billion version. They've acted because they can't justify a vote for so much spending for so little economic effect. You know a piece of legislation is in trouble when even its authors begin to deny paternity, as economist Martin Feldstein has recently done. - Wall Street Journal


    Post sponsored by Quality-Resumes. 

    4.2.09

    The Honeymoon is Over

    "I know I haven't spent a lot of time learning the ways of Washington. But I've been there long enough to know that the ways of Washington must change." - Barack Obama as he launched his presidential bid in Springfield, IL.

    As the news has unfolded over the past few weeks the country has wondered what happened to that soaring rhetoric about change and a new "era of responsibility," and whether the man they hired for the job has enough real world experience to pull off the heavy lifting such revolutionary reinvention requires. Maybe the nation is coming to realize that Hillary and McCain were right, experience does matter.

    The new Obama administration is only a few weeks old, but in this time of national crisis and 24/7 news coverage, there is plenty to comment on at this early date, and according to Maureen Dowd, the left-leaning scribe at the New York Times, the honeymoon already seems to be over. "It took Daschle’s resignation to shake the president out of his arrogant attitude that his charmed circle doesn’t have to abide by the lofty standards he lectured the rest of us about for two years." The problem, in fact, goes well beyond just Daschle; the list of Friends of Obama (FOO) is rife with examples of arrogance and malfeasance. To recap:

    • Bill Richardson- withdrew from consideration as Commerce secretary last month because of a grand jury investigation into state contracts. The panel is investigating whether contributions of $110,000 to Richardson’s political committees from 2003 through 2005 were related to a 2004 state contract that earned nearly $1.5 million in business for a donor’s firm.
    • Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner’s nomination was delayed after it was disclosed that he had failed to pay more than $34,000 in self-employment taxes while working for the International Monetary Fund.
    • Nancy Killefer, a former U.S. Treasury official who oversaw an IRS overhaul, withdrew her candidacy Tuesday as the U.S. government’s chief performance officer. In 2005, the District of Columbia had filed a $946.69 tax lien on her home for failing to pay unemployment compensation taxes for a household employee.
    • Former Senate majority leader Tom Daschle withdrew his nomination Tuesday as secretary of Health and Human Services over revelations that he failed to pay more than $128,000 in taxes for consulting income and the use of a car and driver. In addition, he had earned nearly $2 million over the past couple years while working for a lobbying firm specializing in what...the health care industry of course.

    Lobbyists, Tax Cheats and Hypocrites, Oh My!

    While every new administration has some misfires when it comes to filling out a cabinet, one does sense a pattern here. "I campaigned on changing Washington and bottom-up politics," he told CNN. "I don't want to send a message to the American people that there are two sets of standards, one for powerful people and one for ordinary folks who are working every day and paying their taxes." Funny, that is exactly the message being sent. But the early stumbles don't stop there; the handling of the $1 trillion stimulus package has also been less than stellar.

    The former administration admittedly mishandled the initial bailout by not requiring strict oversight. Now we have reports of Wells Fargo going to Vegas and $50 billion airplanes. The mood of the nation is turning decidedly against these masters of the universe, to the point where class warfare seems to be boiling just under the surface. Into this mess President Obama is pushing the biggest spending plan in history. One can argue that his original plan was not as bloated as the one passed by the house Democrats, without the help of a single Republican, but that isn't much of a defense. This simply means that his youthful inexperience allowed Speaker Pelosi to railroad through a plan stuffed with such goodies as funds for film for Hollywood producers and billions of dollars to help those floundering in the wilderness of dial up internet. With the country in no mood to waste its money this was a fool-hearty bill and the newly elected president, with political capital to spare, should have better controlled his fellow Democrats.

    You know things are not going well for Obama when even constant cheerleader Chris Mathews of MSNBC is voicing frustration over the missteps and backsliding of the man elected to change the atmosphere of Washington. Maybe that tingle he felt running up his leg the night of the Iowa Caucus was just an allergic reaction.

    Update: "The White House's nominee for Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, Leon Panetta, has earned more than $700,000 in speaking and consulting fees since the beginning of 2008, with some of the payments coming from troubled financial firms and from a firm that invests in contractors for federal national security agencies, according to financial disclosures released Wednesday." Glenn Simpson WSJ.
    The hits just keep on coming.

    Post sponsored by Quality-Resumes.

    1.2.09

    A Spoiled Nation?

    A nation-wide strike in France severely disrupted air, rail and commuter service last week. Hospitals reduced staff, and teachers, civil servants, journalists and transportation workers decided not to show up to work to protest the global economic crisis. The French called it "Black Thursday" with workers venting their concern as the country teeters on the edge of recession. While normally what happens in France is not something we take much note of here, this recent news is a trouble sign of what could be our future. With the U.S. looking at the largest government investment in infrastructure and services in it's history we are moving in a troubling direction. The more U.S. citizens come to rely on the government, the more like France we look. How far away are we from national strikes to vent frustration over the failures of the nanny state to take care of us.

    Anyone who has kids, or knows one, realizes that spoiling them inevitably leads to problems. If, as a parent, you cave to your child's every whim and demand eventually they will come to expect what once may have been a treat or a special occasion. This leads to ungrateful children who are not willing to strive for much, because they have been accustomed to getting their way with minimal effort. All one has to do is look at a modern college campus to see the result of this parenting style. Students who are utterly lost when presented with their first real taste of freedom and responsibility are all too common. They don't have the self discipline to monitor their own studies and the lack the self control to avoid the ever present credit card offers. Soon they are deep in debt with sinking GPA's. We instinctively know that spoiling our children does not help them in the long run. Then why do do many advocate it for their country?

    The U.S. is in danger of becoming a spoiled child if the senate passes the Democratic "stimulus" package as it is now constituted. While President Obama has given the appearance of bipartisanship and has made a show of talking to Republicans, when it came to actually craft a bill either he, or Nancy Pelosi, has reverted to an extreme leftist position and created one that instead of providing real stimulus, funds every social program that any Democrat has dreamed up over the past 10 years. We all know that Bush grew the government at far too great a rate, but this makes him look like a small government libertarian.

    While no one like to see someone suffer, go through hard times, be forced to adjust to painful new circumstances, it is sometimes necessary. If we do not want to look like much of socialist leaning Europe in the next generation we need to face the fact that we need to go through a rough time right now. Bailouts need to stop. The financial industry does not seem to be using them wisely anyway, just look at the billions of dollars that have been given out as bonuses at the same time they are begging for more tax-payer handouts. Instead of spending $1 trillion on a programs bonanza the government should institute a tax holiday. That amount of money put directly into consumers hands will do more for the economy than any government run social welfare could.

    The cleansing fire of a recession is going to be painful but it is part of living with a capitalist society. The Great Depression helped spawn "The Greatest Generation," the exact opposite of the spoiled child syndrome we see taking over countries like France. It is time to stand up and decide who we want to be.

    Post sponsored by Quality-Resumes.