What the Moderate Republican Stands For

Republicans came to power as the party of big ideas, and without returning to that model they could be looking at a long winter. Additionally, those big ideas need to focus on Middle America. Three issues that could work are conservation, reform and localism.

Conservation- a return to the Teddy Roosevelt model of conservation. One doesn’t necessarily have to buy into global warming to appreciate the need to protect the natural resources we have.

Reform- the federal government is bigger than ever, and won’t be getting any smaller over the next four years. Republicans need to fashion themselves as national reformers. Much of Middle America wants the government as safety net, but bloated bureaucracies breed corruption that needs to be dealt with.

Localism- this is the lynchpin that brings it all together. If we bought our food locally, shopped locally, governed locally, many of the issue we now have to deal with would go away, or at the least become manageable.

Below is a collection of writers who speak about the things that matter. Some are Right, some Left and some Center, but all intelligent and rational voices.

The American Conservative » Rod Dreher

Via Meadia

Front Porch Republic

David Brooks

The Soap Box

A Question of Direction for the Republican Party

Regular readers will know that the Rockefeller Republican has always liked and appreciated John McCain. While he may stray a bit too far off the reservation at times, in general, he has the center-right approach to government that seems to offer the most hope for actual work getting down.

However, the fact that many on the right feel he moves the party too far to the center is a valid argument as well. This is an honest intellectual debate for conservatives to have. In that vein the quote below is from David Brooks. I'd love to here people's thoughts on this.

So the myth returns. Just months after the election and the humiliation, everyone is again convinced that Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity and the rest possess real power. And the saddest thing is that even Republican politicians come to believe it. They mistake media for reality. They pre-emptively surrender to armies that don't exist.

They pay more attention to Rush's imaginary millions than to the real voters down the street. The Republican Party is unpopular because it's more interested in pleasing Rush's ghosts than actual people. The party is leaderless right now because nobody has the guts to step outside the rigid parameters enforced by the radio jocks and create a new party identity. The party is losing because it has adopted a radio entertainer's niche-building strategy, while abandoning the politician's coalition-building strategy.

The rise of Beck, Hannity, Bill O'Reilly and the rest has correlated almost perfectly with the decline of the G.O.P. But it's not because the talk jocks have real power. It's because they have illusory power, because Republicans hear the media mythology and fall for it every time.


3 comments:

Beth said...

Are you saying that you find it hard to believe that Beck and Limbaugh are popular because people simply AGREE with them? It seems like you are dismissing that very real possibility. Therefore, your attempt to redefine the Republican party by taking it to the middle is really going to mean they will keep losing.

Steve B said...

I do not doubt for a second that people agree with them. I actually like Hannity and O'Reilly quite a bit. What I am wondering is whether or not the Republican Party is aligning itself with a movement which is represented by Beck et al.

While their collective audiences are impressive, they do not seem to be enough to elect a national candidate. I think political parties should be about building coalitions in order to further an agenda. The movement lead by Beck et. al. can and should be part of the Republican coalition, but they can not be the only part if we want to move forward.

Beth said...

I'm not sure the Republicans want the Beck people to be honest, and the Beck people seem to be fine with going Independent from what I can tell.

I do not put Hannity in the same league as Beck; Hannity is a Republican hack. O'Reilly I like, but he tries to be too impartial.

Beck and Limbaugh are the voices of the Reagan style conservative movement, and many people (such as myself) who follow them do so because we believe in the basic Constitutional values our country was founded on, and wish for a return to it.