What the Moderate Republican Stands For

Republicans came to power as the party of big ideas, and without returning to that model they could be looking at a long winter. Additionally, those big ideas need to focus on Middle America. Three issues that could work are conservation, reform and localism.

Conservation- a return to the Teddy Roosevelt model of conservation. One doesn’t necessarily have to buy into global warming to appreciate the need to protect the natural resources we have.

Reform- the federal government is bigger than ever, and won’t be getting any smaller over the next four years. Republicans need to fashion themselves as national reformers. Much of Middle America wants the government as safety net, but bloated bureaucracies breed corruption that needs to be dealt with.

Localism- this is the lynchpin that brings it all together. If we bought our food locally, shopped locally, governed locally, many of the issue we now have to deal with would go away, or at the least become manageable.

Below is a collection of writers who speak about the things that matter. Some are Right, some Left and some Center, but all intelligent and rational voices.

The American Conservative » Rod Dreher

Via Meadia

Front Porch Republic

David Brooks

The Soap Box

Root-Causes

One of the hallmarks of the Radical Left is its belief that, if poor people behave badly, the fault is not theirs, but instead it lies with "root causes." The basic idea is that it is not the criminal’s fault; he is simply too disadvantaged to do any better. This belief extends beyond simply the poor, but to all disaffected members of society at large, in fact to people anywhere in the world. Now we have CNN’s Deepak Chopra blaming America for the past weekends attacks in Mumbai.

From his CNN interview: What happened in Mumbai, he told the interviewer, was a product of the U.S. war on terrorism, that "our policies, our foreign policies" had alienated the Muslim population, that we had "gone after the wrong people" and inflamed moderates. And "that inflammation then gets organized and appears as this disaster in Bombay."

Two interviews with Larry King brought more of the same -- suggestions about the role the U.S. had played in fueling assaults by Muslim terrorists, reminders of the numbers of Muslims in the world and their grievances. A faithful adherent of the root-causes theory of crime -- mass murder, in the case at hand -- Dr. Chopra pointed out, quite unnecessarily, that most of the terrorism in the world came from Muslims. It was mandatory, then, to address their grievances -- "humiliation," "poverty," "lack of education." The U.S., he recommended, should undertake a Marshall Plan for Muslims. - Dorothy Rabinowitz Wall Street Journal

It is this kind of blame-the-victim mentality that many on the Right fear that a newly emboldened Left will promulgate. While there is certainly merit in looking at all sides of an issue as complex as Islamic terrorism to simplify it to the extent that some would have us do is folly.

Dr. Chopra wants the U.S. to address Muslim’s poverty and lack of education? How, and more important, why should we do that exactly? Islamic countries are sovereign nations, who unless I am mistaken, do not want anything to do with us. Much as Dr. Chopra would like to solve the world’s problems with international social programs, that will not work. Ask any parent, you do not reward bad behavior. Bad behavior must be punished, and when that behavior is mass murder, there is only one appropriate punishment.

Post sponsored by Quality-Resumes. 

1 comments:

Anonymous said...

Interesting!
Sometimes it is less expensive to address the problem with dollars for education and the like rather than MORE dollars and sometimes military later on!
Not that I totally disagree with your comments